Pillars of Pakistan
Pillars of Pakistan: The 27th Amendment has passed, and many lawyers and others feel upset. They believe the judiciary has lost its independence. They say one major pillar of the state has collapsed. But parliament has also grown weak over the years. It no longer acts on its own. Instead, it follows orders from party leaders and other powerful actors.
Silent Surrender
We saw signs of this during the 18th Amendment. Later, it became clearer when parliament quickly approved Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa’s extension. Since then, it has passed constitutional amendments within days. Lawmakers vote as they are told, whether they sit in government or in opposition.
The executive looks stronger on paper after the new laws, but it cannot make decisions freely. Real decisions happen behind closed doors. Often, it is unclear who leads meetings or makes choices. This surrender of authority stays hidden, but its effects are visible.
Shaken Pillars
Today, none of the three pillars of the state stand firm. Political theory says these branches should stay independent, but in Pakistan they crumble instead. Still, people often use the word “state” to refer to one powerful institution. The word also shows its strength and our own helplessness.
The 27th Amendment also changes the armed forces. It removes the joint chief’s post and creates a new CDF. The army chief will hold this role, giving him far more power. The amendment also increases the tenure of all service chiefs from three to five years. It gives the COAS/CDF lifetime immunity, like the president.
Above the Law
Supporters say these changes will boost coordination and prepare the forces for modern warfare. They talk about readiness and integration, but these terms mean little to most people. It is easier to understand the basic concerns.
Many fear that the amendment gives too much power to one person. They worry because this person also becomes above the law. Some say powerful men were always above the law—Gen Musharraf’s trial shows this. But now this reality sits clearly written in the law. In a country with weak accountability, giving immunity to officials sets a dangerous example. Others may demand the same protection. It may also encourage decisions without fear of consequences.
Unequal Forces
People also worry about the air force and navy. If the army chief gains greater power, will the other branches still have a voice? How will leaders decide budgets or wartime actions? Some insiders mention the 2019 India clash, saying the army chief was outvoted. Many question this story, but it still raises doubts. These doubts grow because no open debate took place.
Power Politics
Political effects also worry many. In Pakistan, powerful posts often attract heavy lobbying. If the system centralises more power in fewer roles, it may spark even more lobbying for key positions and fast promotions. This will weaken both military professionalism and civilian institutions.
Pakistan is already a divided society. Legislation continues to weaken institutions like the judiciary. Any move that increases centralisation and internal politicking should worry us. Until leaders give clear answers, these concerns will continue to grow.
Published in Dawn, 18th November 2025
